Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2018 - IJCMAS--ICV 2018: 95.39 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020]For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer

Indexed in



National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020)
[Effective from January 1, 2020]
For more details click here

ICV 2018: 95.39
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2018 - IJCMAS--ICV 2018: 95.39
For more details click here

See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues

Original Research Articles

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2018.7(5): 3199-3205
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.374


Studies on Effect of Methods of Sowing and Integrated Nutrient Management in Late Sown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Aditya Singh, D.D. Yadav, Rentapalli Balaji*, Prabhakara Reddy Kallam, Manish Bhatt and Prabin Dawadee
Department of Agronomy, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, UP-2008002, India
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi 2013-14 and 2014-15 at Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur with a view to assess the effect of methods of sowing and integrated nutrient management on growth, yield attributes grain yield and economics in late sown wheat cv. HUV-234. The experiment was laid out in a Split plot design with three replications. Treatment were three methods of sowing [broadcasting of the seed -M1, Line sowing (20cm apart) -M2 and cross sowing -M3] in main plots and seven nutrient management practices [with Control -N1, RDF 100% -N2, RDF + FYM@ 5.0 t ha-1 -N3, RDF + FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1 + PSB + Azotobactor + Trichoderma -N4, RDF + Vermicompost @ 2.0 t ha-1 -N5, RDF + Vermicompost @ 1.0 t ha-1 + PSB + Azotobactor + Trichoderma -N6 and RDF + FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Vermicompost @ 1.0 t ha-1 + PSB + Azotobacter + Trichoderma -N7] in sub plots. Results revealed that among the methods of sowing, cross sowing perform regarding yield and yield attributes with significantly highest grain and straw yield (38.85, 61.84 q/ha) than M1 (35.93, 57.55 q/ha) and M2 (36.78, 57.94 q/ha) and net profit (Rs. 108902 /ha) over M1 (Rs. 96994 /ha), M2 (Rs. 99732 /ha) respectively. B: C ratio was also recorded highest (3.53) in cross sowing. Among the nutrient management practices T7 perform regarding yield and yield attributes with significantly highest grain (50.98 q/ha), straw yield (76.31 q/ha) and net profit (Rs. 147942 /ha) and B: C ratio (4.44) over rest of the treatments. It was also noted that integrated nutrient management practices perform significantly better than RDF alone and control. Treatment combination M3 x N7 recorded significantly better yield attributes with highest grain and straw yield (52.87 q/ha, 78.84 q/ha), net profit (Rs. 154517 /ha) and B: C ratio (4.59) than rest of the combinations respectively.


Keywords: Late sown, INM, Azotobacter, Economics, Vermicompost
Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Aditya Singh, D.D. Yadav, Rentapalli Balaji, Prabhakara Reddy Kallam, Manish Bhatt and Prabin Dawadee. 2018. Studies on Effect of Methods of Sowing and Integrated Nutrient Management in Late Sown Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 7(5): 3199-3205. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.374