Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2023 - IJCMAS--ICV 2023: 95.56 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020] For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer


See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues
Download Publication Certificate

Original Research Articles Volume : 15, Issue : 10, October, 2026

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com
submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2026.15(10) : 332-339
DOI : https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2026.1510.036


Steady State CFD Assessment of Airflow in a Portable Laminar Airflow Cabinet Integrated with an Incubator

Kartik Chauhan, Rajesh Chaudhari and Dolatsinh Zala*
GTU-School of Applied Sciences and Technology, Gujarat Technological University,  Ahmedabad, Gujarat-382424, India
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

Integrating a portable laminar airflow cabinet with an incubator offers a compact platform for laboratory work, but the airflow distribution within the shared assembly requires characterization. This study evaluated steady airflow in an integrated cabinet using SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation 2023. A three-dimensional, laminar-only model was implemented in an external computational domain that included the internal spaces. Air was supplied at a prescribed normal velocity of 0.300 m/s and a temperature of 293.20 K, with an ambient pressure of 101325 Pa. The model contained 257976 reported computational cells, and the calculation proceeded for 128 iterations. Predicted speed ranged from 0 to 0.604 m/s, while the global Z-velocity component ranged from −0.012 to 0.604 m/s. Transverse velocity components remained within approximately ±0.025 m/s. The visualizations showed predominantly forward-directed airflow, with a faster central region and slower peripheral flow. Inlet-surface velocity goals stabilized near 0.300 m/s, indicating consistency with the prescribed boundary condition. The results identify spatial variation that is not captured by the nominal inlet velocity and provide a numerical baseline for selecting downstream measurement locations. Work-area uniformity and predictive accuracy require further evaluation through velocity mapping, mesh sensitivity analysis, and experimental comparison. The findings apply to the modeled airflow condition and do not establish filtration efficiency, microbiological protection, or incubator temperature control.


Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics; laminar airflow cabinet; portable laboratory equipment; integrated incubator; velocity distribution; steady flow


References:
  1. World Health Organization. Laboratory biosafety manual, fourth edition: laboratory design and maintenance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240011397 .
  2. Chauhan K, Zala D. Laminar flow and biosafety: essentials for cleanrooms. 1st ed. BP International; 2024. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mono/978-93-48859-52-5
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories. 6th ed. Meechan PJ, Potts J, editors. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2020.
  4. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14644-1:2015. Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments—Part 1: classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration. Geneva: ISO; 2015. https://www.iso.org/standard/53394.html.
  5. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14644-3:2019. Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments—Part 3: test methods. Geneva: ISO; 2019. Corrected version 2020-06. https://www.iso.org/standard/60598.html.
  6. Chen Q. Ventilation performance prediction for buildings: a method overview and recent applications. Building and Environment. 2009;44(4):848–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.025
  7. Chen Q, Lee K, Mazumdar S, Poussou S, Wang L, Wang M, Zhang Z. Ventilation performance prediction for buildings: model assessment. Building and Environment. 2010;45(2):295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.008
  8. Chen Q, Srebric J. A procedure for verification, validation, and reporting of indoor environment CFD analyses. HVAC&R Research. 2002;8(2):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2002.10391437
  9. Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2008;130(7):078001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953.
  10. Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation. An introduction to flow analysis applications with SolidWorks Flow Simulation: instructor guide. SolidWorks 2011 edition. Concord, MA: Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation; 2011. https://www.solidworks.com/sw/docs/Flow_Sim_InstructorWB_2011_ENG.pdf

Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Kartik Chauhan, Rajesh Chaudhari and Dolatsinh Zala. 2026. Steady State CFD Assessment of Airflow in a Portable Laminar Airflow Cabinet Integrated with an Incubator Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 15(10): 332-339 doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2026.1510.036
Copyright: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license

Citations

"; var printWin = window.open( '', '', 'scrollbars=yes,width=' + w + ',height=' + h + ',top=' + top + ',left=' + left ); printWin.document.write(html); printWin.document.close(); printWin.focus(); printWin.print(); printWin.close(); }