National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
This study evaluated the effects of STCR-based fertilizer prescriptions and farmyard manure (FYM) on yield, nutrient uptake, and overall nutrient use efficiency in mustard cultivated on Vertisols of Chhattisgarh. A factorial randomized block design with three replications comprising 16 treatments tracked the influence of targeted nutrient regimes (N, P, K) with or without FYM, including yield-target scenarios (14, 18, and 22 q/ha). Grain and straw yields responded positively to STCR-based fertilizer doses, with the highest realized yield of 21.79 q/ha under T8 (yield target 22 q/ha). Across yield targets, FYM generally enhanced nutrient use efficiency, though its effect on total nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium uptake varied with the fertilizer regime. Nitrogen uptake was highest under the same STCR-based dose, while phosphorus and potassium uptakes followed similar trend lines, with T8 often yielding the peak total uptake. Interaction effects between FYM and fertilizer were largely non-significant, suggesting additive rather than synergistic interactions under the tested conditions. Omitting N markedly reduced yields and uptake, underscoring nitrogen’s pivotal role in mustard productivity. The findings corroborate prior work on STCR-based nutrient prescriptions and highlight the viability of integrating inorganic fertilizers with organic amendments to stabilize yields, optimize nutrient uptake, and improve resource use efficiency in Vertisol-based systems. Implications for extension and policy emphasize adopting soil-test-guided nutrient management to meet targeted yield goals while mitigating input costs.
Ahmed Sabina, Basumatary, A., Das, K.N. and Medhi, B.K. 2015. Targeted yield based fertilizer prescriptions for autumn rice (Oryza sativa L.) in inceptisols of Assam, India Indian J. Agric. Res., 49 (5) 2015: 437-441 https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.v49i5.5807
Bhandari, D. and Gautam, P., 2013. Optimization and validation of targeted yield equation-based fertiuzer doses under inm for wheat in tara/region of Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 47(1), pp.16-25.
Chapman, H. D., & Pratt, P. F. 1961. Methods of analysis for soils. Plants and Waters, 169-176.
Dev, G., Dhillon, N.S., Brar, J.S. and Vig, A.C., 1985. Soil test-based yield targets for wheat production. Fertiliser News.
Dobermann, A., Witt, C., Abdulrachman, S., Gines, H.C., Nagarajan, R., Son, T.T., Tan, P.S., Wang, G.H., Chien, N.V., Thoa, V.T.K. and Phung, C.V., 2003. Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of Asia. Agronomy Journal, 95(4), pp. 913-923. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.0913
Jackson, M. L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis, pentice hall of india Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.
Milap, Chand., Vig, A.C., Dev, G. and Sidhu, A.S., 1984. Evaluation of fertilize recommendation based on soil tests for targetting rice yield on cultivators' fields. Journal of research-Punjab Agricultural University.
Pranab Mete 2010.Fertilizer recommendation for rice and yellow sarson based on soil test crop response in old alluvial zone of West Bengal. Journal of Interacademicia. 14(4):593-597
Ramamoorthy B, Narasimham RL, Dinesh RS. Fertilizer application for specific yield target of sonara-64 wheat. Indian Farming. 1967; 17:43-45.
Sonar KR, Kumbhar DD, Patil BP, Shinde SS, Wandre SS, Zende GK. Fertilizer requirement for yield targeting of sorghum based on soil test values J Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 1982; 7(1):4-6.
Subba-Rao A, Srivastava S (2001) Soil test based fertilizer recommendation for targeted yields of crops. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Soil Testing for Balanced and Integrated Use of Fertilizers and Manures, Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal, India, pp 326
Truog, E. 1960. Fifty years of soil testing. Transactions of Seventh International Congress of Soil Science 3:46–53.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |