Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2023 - IJCMAS--ICV 2023: 95.56 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020] For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer


See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues
Download Publication Certificate

Original Research Articles                      Volume : 14, Issue:11, November, 2025

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com /
submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2025.14(11): 12-19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2025.1411.002


Comparative Profiling of Phytochemical and Nutritional Constituents in Neem, Gooseberry and Tulsi Leaves
R. Rasu*, S. Blessina and N. Sangeetha
Department of Biochemistry, Kongu Arts and Science College, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the phytochemical and nutritional constituents of Azadirachta indica (Neem), Phyllanthus emblica (Gooseberry), and Ocimum sanctum (Tulsi) leaves using aqueous and ethanolic extracts. Physical parameters showed notable variation, with Tulsi exhibiting the highest ash content, while Gooseberry demonstrated maximum moisture content. Qualitative phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics, tannins, saponins, and terpenoids across all samples, with ethanolic extracts yielding higher concentrations of most secondary metabolites. Quantitative profiling confirmed this trend, with Tulsi showing elevated phenolic and flavonoid contents, and Gooseberry exhibiting higher alkaloid and tannin levels in ethanolic extracts. Aqueous extracts were richer in Vitamin C, iron, and magnesium, reflecting the solubility of these constituents in polar solvents. Gooseberry contained the highest Vitamin C, whereas Tulsi had the highest Vitamin E in ethanolic extracts. These findings validate the biochemical diversity of the selected medicinal plants and highlight their relevance as sources of bioactive and nutritional compounds. Although analysed separately, the distinct phytochemical and nutritional profiles suggest potential synergic benefits if formulated together. Overall, this comparative assessment supports the scientific basis for their traditional use and indicates their promise for future nutraceutical and herbal applications.


Keywords: Neem; Gooseberry, Tulsi, Phytochemical profiling, Vitamins, Minerals


References:

Baliga, M. S., & Dsouza, J. J. (2011). Amla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn), a wonder berry in the treatment and prevention of cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 20(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834473f4

Biswas, K., Chattopadhyay, I., Banerjee, R. K., & Bandyopadhyay, U. (2002). Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica). Current Science, 82(11), 1336–1345.

Brigelius-Flohé, R., & Traber, M. G. (1999). Vitamin E: Function and metabolism. The FASEB Journal, 13(10), 1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.13.10.1145

Ghosal, S., Tripathi, V. K., & Chauhan, S. (1996). Active constituents of Emblica officinalis: Part 1—The chemistry and antioxidant effects of two new hydrolysable tannins, emblicanin A and B. Indian Journal of Chemistry, 35B, 941–948.

Gupta, S., Lakshmi, A. J., Manjunath, M. N., & Prakash, J. (2005). Analysis of nutrient and antinutrient content of underutilized green leafy vegetables. Food Science and Technology, 38, 339–345.

Harborne, J. B. (1998). Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. Springer.

Islas-Flores, I., Gómez-Ortí, D., & Rivera, G. (2022). Neem (Azadirachta indica): A review of its potential as an alternative bioinsecticide. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13, 891535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.891535

Jamshidi, N., & Cohen, M. M. (2017). The clinical efficacy and safety of Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) in humans: A systematic review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2017, 9217567. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9217567

Kabata-Pendias, A. (2010). Trace elements in soils and plants (4th ed.). CRC Press.

Kelm, M. A., Nair, M. G., Strasburg, G. M., & DeWitt, D. L. (2000). Antioxidant and cyclooxygenase inhibitory phenolic compounds from Ocimum sanctum Linn. Phytomedicine, 7(1), 7–13.

Khan, K. H. (2009). Roles of Emblica officinalis in medicine – A review. Botany Research International, 2(4), 218–228.

Kharwar, R. N., Mishra, A., Gond, S. K., Stierle, A., & Stierle, D. (2020). Anticancer compounds derived from fungal endophytes: Their importance and future challenges. Natural Product Reports, 37(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NP00042F

Levine, M., Rumsey, S. C., Wang, Y., Park, J. B., & Daruwala, R. (1995). Vitamin C. In Present Knowledge in Nutrition (pp. 146–159). ILSI Press.

Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

Pattanayak, P., Behera, P., Das, D., & Panda, S. K. (2010). Ocimum sanctum Linn. A reservoir plant for therapeutic applications: An overview. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 4(7), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.70902

Prakash, P., & Gupta, N. (2005). Therapeutic uses of Ocimum sanctum Linn (Tulsi) with a note on eugenol and its pharmacological actions: A short review. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 49(2), 125–131.

Scartezzini, P., Antognoni, F., Raggi, M. A., Poli, F., & Sabbioni, C. (2000). Vitamin C content and antioxidant activity of Emblica officinalis Gaertn. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 71(1–2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00189-0

Sofowora, A. (1993). Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa (2nd ed.). Spectrum Books.

Subapriya, R., & Nagini, S. (2005). Medicinal properties of neem leaves: A review. Current Medicinal Chemistry – Anti-Cancer Agents, 5, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568011053174828

Trease, G. E., & Evans, W. C. (2002). Pharmacognosy (15th ed.). Saunders Publishers.

Varma, A., Nair, N., & Rawat, P. (2022). Phyllanthus emblica: A comprehensive review of phytochemistry, traditional uses, and pharmacological properties. Antioxidants, 11(5), 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050816

Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Rasu R., S. Blessina and Sangeetha N. 2025. Comparative Profiling of Phytochemical and Nutritional Constituents in Neem, Gooseberry and Tulsi Leaves.Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 14(11): 12-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2025.1411.002
Copyright: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

Citations