![]() |
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
Contract farming based on a contract between farmers and agro-processing and/or marketing firms is catching on in Indian agriculture due to increase in the demand for processed products, change in consumption habits and conducive policy environment. The concept behind the promotion of contract farming is to encourage private investment in agriculture and to reduce market risks as well as post-harvest losses, especially risk-oriented fruits, vegetables and high value crops. The private sector may play a role in providing a range of services to small and marginal farmers from input supply to marketing of produce. In this context, the present paper attempts to quantify the benefits of contract farming on farmers’ income and investigates the determinants of participation in contract farming. This is based on a survey of 180 farmers engaged in cultivation of onion from Maharashtra State. The study reveals that contract farming, by connecting smallholders to high-end international market, ensures them with higher returns to the tune of Rs. 12.5 per kilogram over independent farmers. It is seen that to some extent contract farming would remove the constraints faced by the small and marginal holders in Indian agriculture and help them to move out from the poverty trap. Access to institutional credit, extension services, farm-size, own transport, and migration significantly affected farmers’ participation in contract farming. The empirical evidence on benefits from contract farming in high value export commodities should induce conducive policies for promotion and up scaling of contract farming in India. It was observed that contract farming cannot be seen as a panacea for all the problems afflicting the Indian agriculture while it has the potential to address the problems relating to access to market (input and output), new technology and price stability. A need is suggested for better institutional mechanism to make contract farming more inclusive and sustainable.
Birthal, P.S., P.K. Joshi, and A. Gulati. 2005. Vertical Coordination in High Value Food Commodities: Implication for Small Holders. MTID Discussion Paper No 85. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Chand, R. (2005), “India's Agricultural Challenges: Reflections on Policy, Technology and Other Issues”, Centre for Trade & Development, New Delhi.
Dev, S. M. and N. C. Rao. (2005) “Food Processing and Contract Farming in Andhra Pradesh: A Small Farmer Perspective.” Economic and Political weekly, 40(26): 2705–2713. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4416818
Dileep, B. K., R.K. Grover, and K.N. Rai. 2002. “Contract Farming in Tomato: An Economic Analysis.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2): 197-210.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). The state of food and agriculture 2018: Migration, agriculture and rural development. FAO. https://doi.org/10.18356/c4ec0ae6-en
Field survey (2022)
GoI, 2017a. Government of India publication
Kumar, J., and P.K. Kumar. 2008. “Contract Farming: Problems, Prospects and Its Effects on Income and Employment.” Agricultural Economics Research Review 21: 243-250.
Kumar, P. 2006. “Contract Farming through Agribusiness Firms and State Corporation: A Case Study in Punjab.” Economic & Political Weekly 41(52):5367-5375. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4419083
Nagaraj, N., M.G. Chandrakanth, P.G. Chengappa, H.S.Roopa, and P.M. Chandakavate. 2008. “Contract Farming and Its Implications for Input-Supply, Linkages between Markets and Farmers in Karnataka.” Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21: 307–16.
Singh, S. 2002. “Contracting Out Solutions: Political Economy of Contract Farming in the Indian Punjab”.World Development 30(9): 1621-1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00059-1
Tripathi R.S., R. Singh, and S. Singh. 2005. “Contract Farming in Potato Production: An Alternative for Managing Risk and Uncertainty”. Agricultural Economics. Research Review 18(Dec):47–60.![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |