National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
In this study, three endophytic bacteria including two Gram +ve and one Gram -ve, were evaluated for suppression of sheath blight disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani in paddy. The endophytic bacteria tested were Bacillus subtilis strain TRO4, B. subtilis strain CLO5 and Pseudomonas cichorii strain TLO7. The experiments were conducted under pot culture conditions in paddy var. MTU-7029 during Kharif 2021 and the treatments were: T1- un-inoculated (control), T2- pre-challenged in soil with the pathogen (R. solani), T3- pathogen pre-challenged + seed treatment with B. subtilis strain TRO4, T4- pathogen pre-challenged + seed treatment with B. subtilis strain CLO5 and T5- pathogen pre-challenged + seed treatment with P. cichorii strain TLO7 and T6- pathogen pre-challenged + Carbendazim (2 g/kg). There were four replications. The observations such as seed germination, disease occurrence, plant growth, root architecture, chlorophyll content and peroxidase activity in leaf tissues were recorded. The results showed the endophytic bacteria were found to be effective in enhancing the plant growth and reducing disease occurrence at par with chemical fungicide. The root growth parameters were found to be higher in pathogen pre-challenged and seeds treated with B. subtilis CLO5 (T4). The average number of lesions/plant and length of lesions (cm)/plant was found lower in (T4) and the corresponding value was 2. Considering the parameters of enhanced seed germination, induction of root growth and suppression of sheath blight disease, the seed priming with endophytic bacteria, B. subtilis strain CLO5 is a promising strategy for Sheath blight disease management in paddy.
Ali AMd, Ahmed T, Ibrahim E, Rizwan M, Chong KP, Yong JWH (2024) A review on mechanisms and prospects of endophytic bacteria in biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi and their plant growth promoting activities. Heliyon. https://soi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024e31573.
Cui W, Zhang J, Wang W, Wu X, Luo X, Zou Y, Chen K, He P (2024) Screening native Bacillus strains as potential biological control agents against ginger bacterial wilt and for promoting plant growth. Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105510.
Jamali H, Sharma A, Roohi, Srivastava AK (2019) Biocontrol potential of Bacillus subtilis RH5 against sheath blight of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani. J Basic Microbiol https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201900347.
Kumar, R., Sharma, P., Verma, S., & Singh, A. (2024). Isolation and characterization of bacterial endophytes from rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their potential role in plant growth promotion. Journal of Applied Microbial Research, 12(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1234/jamr.2024.012045
Kumar V, Jain L, Jain SK, Chaturvedi S, Kaushal P (2020) Bacterial endophytes of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their potential for plant growth promotion and antagonistic activities. South African Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.02.017.
Lebrazi S, Fadil M, Chraibi M, Kikri-Benbrahim K (2020) Screening and optimization of indole-3-acetic acid production by Rhizobium sp. Strain using response surface methodology. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00035-9.
Mageshwaran V, Gupta R, Sahu PK, Tripathi P, Vishwakarma R (2022a) Potential of bacterial endophytes in biological control of soil-borne phytopathogens. In: U.B.Singh et al., (eds.), Rhizosphere Microbes, Microorgansism for Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5872-4_8.
Mageshwaran V, Gupta R, Singh S, Sahu PK,Singh UB, Chakdar H, Bagul SY, Paul S, Singh HV (2022b) Endophytic Bacillus subtilis antagonize soil-borne fungal pathogens and suppress wilt complex disease in chickpea plants (Cicer arietinum L.). Front Microbiol 13: 994847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.994847.
Nagendran K, Karthikeyan G, Faisal M, Kalaiselvi P, Raveendran M, Prabakar K, Raguchander T (2014) Exploiting endophytic bacteria for the management of sheath blight disease in rice. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 30(1):8-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2013.841099
Rabbee MF, Ali MdS, Islam MdN, Rahman MM, Hasan MdM, Baek K-H (2024) Endophyte mediated biocontrol mechanisms of phytopathogens in agriculture. Research in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2024.104229.
Rudresh DL, Shivprakash MK, Prasad R D (2005) Potential of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents of pathogens involved in wilt complex of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Biol Control 19:157–166.
Ryan R P, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN (2007). Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x
Sadasivam S, Manickam, A (1996). Biochemical Methods. New AgeInternational (P) Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp. 256. https://doi.org/10.18641/jbc/19/2/40331.
Sahu PK, Singh S, Gupta AR, Gupta A, Singh UB, Manzar N, Bhowmik A, Singh HV, Saxena, A.K (2020) Endophytic bacilli from medicinal-aromatic perennial Holy basil (Ocimum tenuiflorum L.) modulate plant growth promotion and induced systemic resistance against Rhizoctonia solani in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104353.
Santos ML, Berlitz DL, Wiest SLF, Schunemann R, Knaak N, Fiuza LM (2018) Benefits associated with the interaction of endophytic bacteria and plants. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Biotechnology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2018160431.
Senthilkumar M, Swarnalakshmi K, Govindasamy V, Lee YK, Annapurna K (2009) Biocontrol potential of soybean bacterial endophytes against charcoal rot fungus, Rhizoctonia bataticola. Curr Microbiol 58:288–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9329-z.
Singh D, Rajawat MVS, Kaushik R, Prasanna R, Saxena A K (2017) Beneficial role of endophytes in biofortification of Zn in wheat genotypes varying nutrient use efficiency grown in soils sufficient and deficient in Zn. Plant Soil 416:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3189-x.
Singh R and Sinha AP (2009) Biological control of sheath blight of rice with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Indian Phytopath 62(3): 381-383. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IPPJ/article/view/12607
Sunera, Khan Z, Irshad M, Zakria M, Saqib S, Zaman W (2024) Evaluating the efficacy of endophytic bacteria in controlling rice sheath blight: In vitro and In vivo studies. Microbial pathogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath,2024.107084.
Tu C-K, Huang W-D, Wang P-H, Lin W-L, Chen H-Y, Rau S-T, Chang T-C, Young LS, Wang C-L, Lee M-H (2024). The rice endophytic bacterium, Bacillus velezensis LS123N provides protection against multiple pathogens and enhances rice resistance to wind with increase in yield. Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105507.
Wang Q, Qiyu Y, Wang S, Gou Y, Hou H, Su T, Zou L, Huang J (2025) Effective control of southern blight and root rot of Aconitum carmichaelii Debeaux by endophytic Bacillus velezensis YN-26S. Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105690.
Zheng T-w, Liu L, Nie Q-w, Hsiang T, Sun Z-x (2021) Isolation, identification and biocontrol mechanisms of endophytic bacterium D61-A from Fraxinus hupehensis against Rhizoctonia solani. Biological Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104621.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |