|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
A field trail was carried out at Campus for Research and Advanced Studies, Dhablan, G.S.S.D.G.S Khalsa College, Patiala during the Rabi season of 2017-18. The field trial was laid out in randomized block design with eleven treatments T1: (Control), T2 : ( 100% RDF ), T3 : (50% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha), T4 : (50% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha),T5: (50% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha), T6: (50% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz.), T7: (50% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha), T8: (100% RDF (NPK) + FYM 5 t/ha), T9: (100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha), T10: (100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz.), T11: (100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha) in three replications. Application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha significantly increased growth, yield attributes and yield of barley. Significantly higher net returns and benefit cost (1.43) were observed with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha. However, benefit cost ratio remained at par with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. (1.40) and also in 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha (1.37).