<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Excellent Publishers</publisher>
<journalTitle>International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS) CODEN(USA)-IJCMO9</journalTitle>
<issn>2319-7692</issn>
<eissn>2319-7706</eissn>
<publicationDate>2015-12-20</publicationDate>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>12</issue>
<startPage>445</startPage>
<endPage>453</endPage>
<documentType>article</documentType> 



<title language="eng">
A Cross Sectional Study Regarding Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Post
Exposure Prophylaxis on Occupational/Accidental Exposure Among Health Care
Workers/Providers at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western Uttar Pradesh of India</title><authors>
			
			<author>
			<name>Amit A. Rangari</name>
			<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
			</author>
			
			
			
</authors>

<affiliationsList>
			<affiliationName affiliationId="1">
Department of Microbiology, Muzaffarnagar Medical College and Hospital,
Muzaffarnagar (U.P.) India
</affiliationName>
			
</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">
			<p>Occupational Exposure refers to exposure to potential blood-borne infections that
may occur in healthcare settings during performance of job duties. World Health
Organization estimates that 3 million percutaneous exposures occur annually among
35 million workers (HCW) globally, with over 90% occurring in resourceconstrained
countries. In addition, such exposures can cause tremendous anxiety, fear
and stress among HCW that can have a negative impact on the HCW while providing
their services. Universal safety precautions deals with measures to prevent exposure
of health care workers to source of infection. While post exposure prophylaxis deals
with prophylactic measures taken to prevent establishment of infection after
occupational/accidental exposure of health care worker/provider to infectious source
material has occurred.Present study aimed to examine and study the knowledge,
attitude and practice of post exposure prophylaxis on occupational/accidental
exposure among health care workers/providers at a tertiary care hospital in western
Uttar Pradesh. 240 HCW volunteers were divided in groups of 10-20 in number and
questionnaire were distributed. Answers revealed , 23(9.5%) volunteers had
undergone training regarding PEP. Majority were unaware of PEP, thus had
casual/careless attitude. 56(23.33%) volunteers gave history of
occupational/accidental exposure. In 0(0%) cases of occupational/accidental
exposure source code &amp; exposure code was initiated. neither were brought in notice
of hospital superintendent and thus as a result neither any record of HCW
occupational/accidental exposure in hospital recorded and maintained. 2(3.5%)
volunteers with occupational/accidental exposure took PEP on their own that too
after 48 hours. Training directed towards proper knowledge and adherence to USP
and PEP can bring about a positive change resulting in willingness of HCW to
provide care for patients with HIV infection and other blood borne pathogens.</p>
</abstract>

<fullTextUrl format="pdf">
http://ijcmas.com/vol-4-12/Amit  A. Rangari.pdf
</fullTextUrl>




<keywords language="eng">
		<keyword> Health Care
Workers</keyword></keywords>
<keywords language="eng">
		<keyword> Post
Exposure
Prophylaxis</keyword></keywords>

<keywords language="eng">
		<keyword>Universal
Safety
Precautions</keyword></keywords>


</record>
</records>