National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
The study examined that marketing of groundnut in Hingoli district of Maharashtra state. In present study cost incurred by producer, wholesaler and retailer in groundnut marketing shows that higher production sold in channel III (144.4q.) followed by channel II (73.18 q.) and channel I (69.18q) The highest production sold in channel III followed by channel III and channel I, respectively. Production, retention and marketed surplus of groundnut sold through different channels were Production of TAG-24 groundnut was 29.50 quintals on 1.64 hectares and SB-11 groundnut 32.05 and its retention for home on TAG-24 was 2.95 and SB-11 was 2.25 quintals. The results revealed that quantity of TAG-24 groundnut as 12.10, and SB-11 12.40 quintals were marketed through channel-I, 9.25 and 11.45quintals in channel-II, 4.65 and 2.55 and channel-I with percentage TAG-24 and SB-11 groundnut 41.00 and 43.28 in channel I, 30.45 and 40.25 in channel II and 16.30 and 8.90 in Channel III, respectively. Thus total marketed surplus of TAG-24 groundnut was 96.61 per cent and 89.39 per cent on SB-11 groundnut. Per quintal marketing cost, marketing margin and price spread in groundnut marketing with respect to different channels. In channel-III price spread was Rs 1105 followed by channel I and channel II Rs. 574.8 and 421.24, respectively.
Citations |
 |
 |
 |
 |
