Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2018 - IJCMAS--ICV 2018: 95.39 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020]For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer

Indexed in



National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
NAAS Score: *5.38 (2019)
[Effective from January 1, 2019]
For more details click here

ICV 2018: 95.39
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2017 - IJCMAS--ICV 2018: 95.39
For more details click here

See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues

Original Research Articles

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2016.5(7): 576-585
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.507.064


Comparative Analysis of Different Biodegradable Wastes for Better Biogas Production
S.Dash* and P. Ray
Department of Microbiology, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751003, Odisha, India
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

Recycle and reusing waste takes little effort on our part, for a big difference to the world. Wastes samples like cow dung slurry, kitchen waste slurry and de-oiled seed cake slurry were collected from different places aseptically and microbiological analysis of the samples was undertaken. A total of 30 bacteria isolates were identified on the basis of cultural, morphological and bio chemical characteristics by using PIBwin software. The bacterial isolates belong to the genera Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Virgibacillus, Streptococcus, Micrococcus and Enterobacter sp. All the bacterial isolates were screened for different enzymatic tests. Fluorescence tests were investigated which revealed that 33.3% bacterial isolates were methanogenic. Biogas production was done by using anaerobic conventional digester. Kitchen waste slurry showed maximum production of bio gas than other samples. Final biogas production was done by using methanogenic isolates from cow dung slurry and the isolate A4 & A8 showed maximum bio gas production. Isolate A4 was identified as Bacillus licheniformis. Further molecular identification of isolate A8 was done. It was identified to be Enterobacter cloacae subsp. dissolvens strain A8 having GenBank accession number KM034810.


Keywords: Anaerobic digester, Biogas, Cowdung,Consortia,de-oiled seed cake, Enterobacter cloacae, Kitchen waste, Methanogeneic bacteria.
Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Dash, S., and Ray, P. 2016. Comparative Analysis of Different Biodegradable Wastes for Better Biogas Production.Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 5(7): 576-585. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.507.064