Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2022 - IJCMAS--ICV 2022: 95.28 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020] For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer


See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues
Download Publication Certificate

Original Research Articles                      Volume : 9, Issue:7, July, 2020

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com /
submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2020.9(7): 4106-4110
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.483


Response of Different Nutritional Foliar Sprays on Growth and Yield of Soybean
H. H. Dikey1*, R. S. Wankhade2, Kavita Patil1 and Shubhangi Shelke1
1Regional Research Centre, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Amravati- 444603, Mahrashtra, India 2Agriculture Research Station, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Achalpur Dist. Amravati- 444806, Mahrashtra, India
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

A field experiment was carried out to study the suitable water soluble fertilizer and its concentration for spraying on soybean at Regional Research Centre, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Amravati, Mahrashtra during kharif season of the year 2017-18. A set of eight treatments control RDF (30 kg N, 75 kg P2O5 and 30 kg K2O per hectare at the time of sowing) + (No spray), RDF + water spray, RDF + spray of 19:19:19 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 13:00:45 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 00:52:34 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 12:61:00 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of urea (02 %), and RDF + spray of DAP (02 %),  were taken (one at flower initiation and second at pod filling stage) under Randomized Block Design with three replication. The experimental results revealed that application of nutritional foliar spray treatment RDF + spray of DAP (2%) recorded significantly higher grain yield (1736 kg/ha) over treatment control RDF +  (No spray) (1355 kg/ha) and RDF + water spray (1397 kg/ha) but at par with treatment RDF + spray of 19:19:19 (0.5 %),  RDF + spray of 13:00:45 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 00:52:34 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 12:61:00 (0.5 %) and  RDF + spray of urea (2 %). The same trend was observed in straw yield. Treatment RDF + spray of DAP 2% showed significantly higher gross monetary returns (52155 Rs/ha), net monetary returns (23748 Rs/ha) and B:C ratio (1.81) over treatment control RDF + (No spray) and RDF + water spray but at par with treatment RDF + spray of 19:19:19 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 13:00:45 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 00:52:34 (0.5 %), RDF + spray of 12:61:00 (0.5 %) and  RDF + spray of urea (02 %).


Keywords: Nutritional foliar sprays, Urea, DAP, 19:19:19, 13:00:45, 00:52:34, 12:61:00

Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Dikey, H. H., R. S. Wankhade, Kavita patil and Shubhangi Shelke. 2020. Response of Different Nutritional Foliar Sprays on Growth and Yield of Soybean.Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9(7): 4106-4110. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.483
Copyright: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

Citations